• Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Yelp
  • Locations
    • Scottsdale
    • Tucson
    • Show Low
  • Make a Payment
  • About
    • Founding Attorney
    • Client Reviews
    • Arizona Estate Planning FAQ
  • Practice Areas
    • Estate Planning
      • Business Succession Planning
        Deeds for Real Property
        Formal Probate
        Health Care Powers of Attorney
        Informal Probate
        Irrevocable trusts
        Last Wills and Testaments
        Living Wills
        Living Trusts
        LLC Formation
        Operating Agreements
        Revocable  Trusts
        Statutory Durable Powers of Attorney
        Trust Administration
        Trust Litigation
    • Business Law
      • Business Attorneys
        Construction Law
        Contracts
        Corporate Counsel
        Corporations
        Employee Rights
        Employer Rights
        Homeowners Associations
        Intellectual Property
        Limited Liability Companies
        Non-Profit Organizations
        Partnerships
        Real Estate
        Trade Names
        Trademarks
    • Lawsuits & Litigation
      • Business & Commercial Disputes
        Car Accident Injury Cases
        Construction Disputes
        Contract Disputes
        Injunctions
        Motorcycle Accidents
        Probate Litigation
        Real Estate Disputes
        Trust and Estate Litigation
        Wrongful Death Cases
  • Articles
    • Business & Employment
    • Wills, Trusts & Estates
    • Marriage, Divorce & Families
    • Lawsuits & Court Cases
    • Audio Interviews
    • Cases & Outcomes
  • Forms
    • Potential New Client Form
    • Estate Planning Questionnaire
    • Probate Questionnaire
  • Get Started
  • Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes

Originally Published by the Federal Trade Commission on April 23, 2024

  • FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes

Today, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule to promote competition by banning noncompetes nationwide, protecting the fundamental freedom of workers to change jobs, increasing innovation, and fostering new business formation.

“Noncompete clauses keep wages low, suppress new ideas, and rob the American economy of dynamism, including from the more than 8,500 new startups that would be created a year once noncompetes are banned,” said FTC Chair Lina M. Khan. “The FTC’s final rule to ban noncompetes will ensure Americans have the freedom to pursue a new job, start a new business, or bring a new idea to market.”

The FTC estimates that the final rule banning noncompetes will lead to new business formation growing by 2.7% per year, resulting in more than 8,500 additional new businesses created each year. The final rule is expected to result in higher earnings for workers, with estimated earnings increasing for the average worker by an additional $524 per year, and it is expected to lower health care costs by up to $194 billion over the next decade. In addition, the final rule is expected to help drive innovation, leading to an estimated average increase of 17,000 to 29,000 more patents each year for the next 10 years under the final rule.

Noncompetes are a widespread and often exploitative practice imposing contractual conditions that prevent workers from taking a new job or starting a new business. Noncompetes often force workers to either stay in a job they want to leave or bear other significant harms and costs, such as being forced to switch to a lower-paying field, being forced to relocate, being forced to leave the workforce altogether, or being forced to defend against expensive litigation. An estimated 30 million workers—nearly one in five Americans—are subject to a noncompete.

Under the FTC’s new rule, existing noncompetes for the vast majority of workers will no longer be enforceable after the rule’s effective date. Existing noncompetes for senior executives – who represent less than 0.75% of workers – can remain in force under the FTC’s final rule, but employers are banned from entering into or attempting to enforce any new noncompetes, even if they involve senior executives. Employers will be required to provide notice to workers other than senior executives who are bound by an existing noncompete that they will not be enforcing any noncompetes against them.

In January 2023, the FTC issued a proposed rule which was subject to a 90-day public comment period. The FTC received more than 26,000 comments on the proposed rule, with over 25,000 comments in support of the FTC’s proposed ban on noncompetes. The comments informed the FTC’s final rulemaking process, with the FTC carefully reviewing each comment and making changes to the proposed rule in response to the public’s feedback.

In the final rule, the Commission has determined that it is an unfair method of competition, and therefore a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, for employers to enter into noncompetes with workers and to enforce certain noncompetes.

The Commission found that noncompetes tend to negatively affect competitive conditions in labor markets by inhibiting efficient matching between workers and employers. The Commission also found that noncompetes tend to negatively affect competitive conditions in product and service markets, inhibiting new business formation and innovation. There is also evidence that noncompetes lead to increased market concentration and higher prices for consumers.

FTC Noncompete

Alternatives to Noncompetes

The Commission found that employers have several alternatives to noncompetes that still enable firms to protect their investments without having to enforce a noncompete.

Trade secret laws and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) both provide employers with well-established means to protect proprietary and other sensitive information. Researchers estimate that over 95% of workers with a noncompete already have an NDA.

The Commission also finds that instead of using noncompetes to lock in workers, employers that wish to retain employees can compete on the merits for the worker’s labor services by improving wages and working conditions.

Changes from the NPRM

Under the final rule, existing noncompetes for senior executives can remain in force. Employers, however, are prohibited from entering into or enforcing new noncompetes with senior executives. The final rule defines senior executives as workers earning more than $151,164 annually and who are in policy-making positions.

Additionally, the Commission has eliminated a provision in the proposed rule that would have required employers to legally modify existing noncompetes by formally rescinding them. That change will help to streamline compliance.

Instead, under the final rule, employers will simply have to provide notice to workers bound to an existing noncompete that the noncompete agreement will not be enforced against them in the future. To aid employers’ compliance with this requirement, the Commission has included model language in the final rule that employers can use to communicate to workers.

The Commission vote to approve the issuance of the final rule was 3-2 with Commissioners Melissa Holyoak and Andrew N. Ferguson voting no. Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, Alvaro Bedoya, Melissa Holyoak and Andrew N. Ferguson each issued separate statements. Chair Lina M. Khan will issue a separate statement.

The final rule will become effective 120 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Once the rule is effective, market participants can report information about a suspected violation of the rule to the Bureau of Competition by emailing noncompete@ftc.gov.

The Federal Trade Commission develops policy initiatives on issues that affect competition, consumers, and the U.S. economy. The FTC will never demand money, make threats, tell you to transfer money, or promise you a prize. Follow the FTC on social media, read consumer alerts and the business blog, and sign up to get the latest FTC news and alerts.

Disclaimer: Laws change constantly. Specific legal advice should be obtained regarding any legal matter. The information contained on this website does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is created. 

Have any questions about this topic?
We’re ready to listen.

Schedule an Exploratory Call
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
  • Visit us on Yelp

Related Content

Ding Dong The Tax Is Dead

January 22, 2025/in Business Law/by Nick Van Vleet

Renters across Arizona have a reason to celebrate. Starting January 2025, the rental tax is gone!

Read more
https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Couple-filing-taxes.jpg 720 1080 Nick Van Vleet https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/logo-loose.svg Nick Van Vleet2025-01-22 08:23:352025-01-22 11:17:20Ding Dong The Tax Is Dead

FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes

April 30, 2024/in Business Law/by Don Loose

FTC’s final rule will generate over 8,500 new businesses each year, raise worker wages, lower health care costs, and boost innovation.

Read more
https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/noncompete.jpg 720 1280 Don Loose https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/logo-loose.svg Don Loose2024-04-30 07:38:062024-04-30 07:40:04FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes

Arizona’s New COVID Laws

June 5, 2022/in Business Law, Lawsuits & Litigation/by Don Loose

As COVID-19 cases continue to rise in Arizona, according to data compiled by state health officials, state lawmakers have enacted two new laws aimed at restricting responses to the malicious and malingering coronavirus.

Read more
https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/loose-feature.jpg 360 700 Don Loose https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/logo-loose.svg Don Loose2022-06-05 03:58:182024-08-30 08:22:18Arizona’s New COVID Laws

Homeowners’ Rights in Planned Communities: The Grass Isn’t Always Greener

May 19, 2022/in Business Law/by Don Loose

The new artificial grass law, which will take effect 91 days after the current legislative session ends (on or around June 24, 2022), will be added to this list of homeowners’ rights. 

Read more
https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/loose-feature.jpg 360 700 Don Loose https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/logo-loose.svg Don Loose2022-05-19 06:17:442023-02-28 08:34:27Homeowners’ Rights in Planned Communities: The Grass Isn’t Always Greener

Oral Contracts and Their Enforceability in Arizona

January 10, 2021/in Business Law/by Don Loose

While different rules apply to proving each, one type of contract is not necessarily more enforceable than the other.

Read more
https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/loose-feature.jpg 360 700 Don Loose https://looselawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/logo-loose.svg Don Loose2021-01-10 17:17:322023-02-28 08:47:21Oral Contracts and Their Enforceability in Arizona
Explore All Articles by Practice Area:
Estate Planning Family Law Business Law Lawsuits & Litigation Personal Injury

Article Topics

  • Business & Employment
  • Wills, Trusts & Estates
  • Marriage, Divorce & Family
  • Lawsuits & Court Cases
  • Audio – Legal Interviews
  • Cases & Outcomes
Popular
  • loose law group logo
    Arizona’s New COVID LawsJune 5, 2022 - 3:58 am
  • loose law group logo
    Raising the Minimum Wage and Extending Terms in TucsonJanuary 2, 2020 - 9:06 am
  • loose law group logo
    Ban on Sanctuary Cities and Ballot Harvesting LawFebruary 6, 2020 - 9:04 am
  • loose law group logo
    Bills Pending in the Arizona LegislatureMay 5, 2020 - 9:02 am
  • loose law group logo
    The Ins and Outs of Businesses Re-Opening During the Pa...May 7, 2020 - 8:59 am
  • divorce attorney in Arizona
    A Divorce Attorney’s Perspective: Annulment, Dissolution...September 2, 2020 - 1:15 pm
  • Prenuptial Agreements
    Prenuptial Agreements – The “Legality of Lo...December 2, 2020 - 8:03 am
Recent
  • loose law group logo
    Consumer Fraud and Property Rights in ArizonaDecember 10, 2025 - 11:21 am
  • loose law group logo
    Unclaimed Property and a Proposal for Non-Lawyer Representation...September 5, 2025 - 10:33 am
  • loose law group logo
    Inside Arizona’s Record Civil Verdicts in 2024August 21, 2025 - 8:34 am
  • loose law group logo
    Arizona Civil Verdicts Rise to $294 Million in 2024July 3, 2025 - 6:33 am
  • loose law group logo
    Homeless Encampment Ruling and House Bill 2867 VetoJune 13, 2025 - 5:01 am
  • Family hugging
    How Establishing a Trust Ensures Your Wishes are Honore...May 18, 2025 - 8:42 am
  • loose law group logo
    Transgender Rights and Arizona’s Push for Stronger Animal...May 8, 2025 - 7:24 am

Loose Practice Areas

  • Corporate Counsel & Business Attorney
  • Estate Planning
  • Lawsuits & Litigation

Get the Handbook

Book arizona-laws-101

Planning Your Estate?

Book Estate-planning-in-Arizona

Scottsdale

7047 E. Greenway Parkway
Suite 400
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
Phone: (602) 971-4800
Fax: (602) 953-3621
Map  |  Details

Tucson

6363 North Swan Rd.
Suite 151
Tucson, AZ 85718
Phone: (520) 615-3100
Fax: (520) 615-3110
Map  |  Details

Show Low

141 N. 6th Street
Show Low, AZ 85901
Phone:  (602) 971-4800
Fax: (602) 953-3621
Map  |  Details

The information contained on this website does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is created. © 2026 Loose Law Group, P.C.
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Yelp
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Design Phoenix
Link to: Arizona’s “Tamale Bill” Signed Arizona’s “Tamale Bill” Signed loose law group logo Link to: Arizona to Repeal the 1864 Abortion Law loose law group logo Arizona to Repeal the 1864 Abortion Law
Scroll to top Scroll to top