“Neither a borrower nor a lender be.”
Debts incurred after marriage are presumed to be community obligations. If the spouse creating the debt intended to benefit the community, the debt is a community obligation.
Because the foundation of community property is a valid marriage, this discussion is applicable only to married couples in Arizona. Single persons cannot own community property, nor can they incur debts for which a community may be liable.
The general rule is that either spouse may contract debts and otherwise act for the benefit of the community. However, both spouses must join in certain transactions for the acquisition, disposition, or encumbrance of an interest in real property, and in transactions involving guaranty, indemnity, or suretyship.
Illustration #1: The husband applies for a loan that will be secured by a deed of trust on the married couple’s house. Because the transaction involves an encumbrance of an interest in real estate, the joinder of both spouses in the transaction is required. This means that the transaction cannot be completed without the wife’s signature.
In an action on a community debt or obligation, the spouses must be sued jointly. The debt or obligation will be satisfied first from the community property, and second, from the separate property of the spouse contracting the debt or obligation.
Illustration #2: The wife, while driving to play golf, negligently injures a pedestrian. The injured pedestrian can sue both spouses and recover from community property and, if that is inadequate, from the wife’s separate property. (Of course, if the couple in this illustration is properly insured, their insurance company will pay damages to the pedestrian injured by the wife’s careless driving).
If both spouses are not named as defendants in a lawsuit arising out of a community obligation, such as in the above illustration, recovery may be had only against the separate property of the spouse who committed the negligent act.
Some additional rules:
The separate property of a spouse is not liable for the separate debts or obligations of the other spouse, absent agreement of the property owner to the contrary.
The community property is liable for a spouse’s debts incurred outside Arizona during the marriage that would have been community debts if incurred in this state.
The community property is liable for the premarital separate debts of a spouse, incurred after September 1, 1973, but only to the extent of the value of that spouse’s contribution to the community that would have been his separate property if single.
Debts or liabilities incurred before marriage are classified as separate, and collectible out of the separate property of the person who incurred them. However, as noted in Additional Rule #3 above, a creditor may also reach the contribution of that spouse to the community property with respect to premarital debts or liabilities incurred after September 1, 1973, in order to avoid so-called marital bankruptcy (avoidance of the premarital debt by the act of marriage).
Child Support: In a case involving child support, the court ruled that the obligation of the husband for the support of his child from a prior marriage was a premarital obligation. Accordingly, the wages of his second wife could not be reached to satisfy the child support obligation.
As noted on community property, the community is dissolved upon the happening of one of these three events:
- service of a petition for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, or annulment, if the petition results in a decree;
- the death of one spouse; or
- the execution of a separation agreement by the spouses. Once the community is dissolved, the community property is not liable for subsequent debts or obligations incurred by either spouse. In the case of divorce or legal separation, the community property ceases to be liable for the individual debts of either spouse upon service of process in that action (so long as the petition results in a decree), despite the existence of a valid marriage.
In an action for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court has the power to allocate the community debts and obligations among the husband and the wife. Community debts not allocated by the court remain the joint obligation of the parties. However, any allocation of debts by the court is not binding on the parties’ creditors; to satisfy a community debt, a creditor may pursue community property assigned to either spouse.
Illustration #3: The husband and wife have a credit card balance at the time of their divorce. The charges on the card were incurred during their marriage. The court orders the husband to pay the debt. Instead of paying the debt as ordered, the husband files bankruptcy. The credit card company can sue the wife to collect the credit card balance, and she will be unable to pursue the debt against her former husband because he is in bankruptcy.
A married person who understands the law governing community debts will be better able to build and maintain good credit. Because credit is so important, every effort should be made to protect it.
The above article is an excerpt from Arizona Laws 101: A Handbook for Non-Lawyers, 2nd Edition (Fenestra Books, 2012), by Donald A. Loose, republished with the author’s permission.
Disclaimer: Laws change constantly. Specific legal advice should be obtained regarding any legal matter. The information contained on this website does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is created.
Donald A. Loose is an Arizona attorney, and the author of Arizona Laws 101: A Handbook for Non-Lawyers, and Estate Planning in Arizona: What You Need to Know. Mr. Loose is a regular guest on radio shows featuring local newsmaker interviews. He may be contacted at email@example.com.
Arizona’s Updated Health Care Provider Lien Laws/in Family Law, Personal Injury/by Michael Ruppert
Arizona’s health care provider lien laws were updated in 2022, let’s take a look.
Can Parents Be Held Accountable for the Misconduct of Their Children?/in Family Law/by Don Loose
It is not a defense that the parents or guardian could not have anticipated the minor’s misconduct.
Delegation of Parental Powers: Care | Custody | Property of the Child/in Family Law/by Don Loose
In Arizona, a parent of a minor (under age 18) may delegate to another person any powers he may have.
How to Change your Name in Arizona and What to Consider/in Family Law/by Don Loose
If a person desires to change his name, he must file an application in the superior court in the county of his residence.
What Actions Could Terminate Parental Rights in Arizona?/in Family Law/by Don Loose
A parent who abandons, neglects or abuses his child (under age 18) may lose his parental rights. Arizona law sets forth the grounds and the procedure for termination of the parent-child relationship.